James F. Radke

James Radke is a commercial litigator who helps clients resolve a wide variety of business disputes. Jamie represents auto dealers, manufacturers, franchisors, commercial landlords, general contractors, assisted living facilities and other businesses in connection with contractual disputes, franchise and distributor issues, landlord/tenant matters, collection actions, tort and product liability matters, noncompetition cases and others. Jamie also represents clients who have experienced data breaches of personal and confidential information. Jamie's practice includes regular appearances in Massachusetts state and federal courts, including bench and jury trials, participation in alternative dispute resolution proceedings and handling appeals in state and federal courts.

In his automotive practice, Jamie has represented auto and heavy equipment dealers in disputes with manufacturers over issues such as assigned territory, performance metrics, termination of franchise agreements, protests of new dealer appointments, warranty reimbursement issues, and violations of M.G.L. c. 93B.

Jamie has served as a mentor to law students with the Boston Lawyers Group and serves on the Firm’s Diversity, Professional Development and Associates Committees. During law school he served as a legal intern for the Honorable John C. Cratsley of the Massachusetts Superior Court.

Representative Matters:

Represented commercial property owner in dispute with tenant, a national healthcare company, and obtained judgment of approximately $1.1 million in property owner’s favor following trial.

Ongoing representation of multinational corporation in product liability cases throughout New England alleging exposure to hazardous substances.

Represented auto dealer threatened with termination by manufacturer in dispute concerning performance metrics, assigned territory and inventory allocation and successfully implemented defense strategy to avoid franchise termination.

Represented general contractor in class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Massachusetts Wage Act and overtime laws.

Represented Massachusetts industry association at the Massachusetts Appeals Court in successful defense of claims alleging defamation and violations of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A. 

Represented financial services firm in dispute with an employee’s former employer concerning alleged violations of noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreements.

• Appellate Practice
• Auto Dealership
• Business Litigation
• Communications
• Construction
• Construction Litigation & Arbitration
• Intellectual Property Litigation
• Litigation
• Long-Term Care
• Privacy and Cybersecurity
• Retail, Restaurant & Hospitality
• Tort and Product Liability
• Unfair Competition, Trade Secrets and Non-Competition Agreements

• Massachusetts Bar Association
• Boston Bar Association
• American Bar Association
• Massachusetts State Auto Dealers Association

• Boston Lawyers Group – Mentor
• Follow Us – Member
• Massachusetts Volunteer Lawyer Project

• Murtha Cullina Diversity Committee
• Murtha Cullina Professional Development Committee
• Murtha Cullina Associates Committee

• Judicial Intern, Massachusetts Superior Court, Summer 2004

• January 5, 2018 - Murtha Cullina LLP Promotes Four Attorneys to Counsel
• Murtha Cullina LLP Continues to Support the Rose Kennedy Greenway Parks

• June 21, 2018 - Retail, Restaurant and Hospitality Group News: Property Managers Lack Standing to Bring Eviction Actions on Behalf of Property Owners
• April 2016 - Automotive Law Group News: Appellate Court Win for Massachusetts State Auto Dealers Association
• March 17, 2016 - Thomas S. Vangel and James F. Radke Successfully Represent Automobile Dealers Association in Massachusetts Appeals Court
• October 22, 2015 - Construction Group News: MA Appeals Court Ruling: Contractor Justified Not Paying Subcontractor That Refused To Perform Work
• HR Professionals: Simple Steps That Can Help Your Company Avoid Becoming A Data Breach Headline
• New EEOC Guidance Requires Greater Caution by Employers in Considering Criminal Records of Job Applicants and Employees
• Recent Amendment to the Massachusetts Personnel Record Statute

• Massachusetts
• U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
• U.S. District Court, District of Maine
• Maine
• U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

• Northeastern University (J.D., 2006)
• Trinity College (B.S., 2002)